Saturday, June 25, 2005

Authentic Culture

Authentic Culture often Isn't


At the Boston Early Music
I attended a talk & demonstration of differences
between Bach performed on the cello before & after Kant's followers dicatated what was authentic in music.
Among other techniques, pizzicato & thumb use were lost after the early 1700's, despite the composer's intention. The Romantic playing of Casals would satisfy Kant but not Bach.
Yo Yo Ma has made pre-Kant gestures by reverting to an earlier style bridge for example. Much of what we accept as appropriate interpretation of early music may need re-interpretation.



I have read that something similar is true regarding my Scottish heritage in terms at least of the kilt & of Scottish dancing: They are largely statements of early 1800's Romanticism.
I wonder what other artistic traditions (like most of Shakespeare's portraits) go no further
back than the early 1800's.
For a start, was the piano tuned & played in classical music the way it is now?
We do know that A=440 was not the
until late in the 1800's.



The question of whether the camera obscura was widely used by others than Vermeer in plotting a picture
may fall into the same category of questioning. Romanticism has altered our
understanding of how performances were accomplished.



Assuming these "facts" can be generalized, why have we not been alerted by our cultural historians?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home